This article provides a complete framework for researchers and drug development professionals to prevent RNA degradation during in situ hybridization (ISH) protocols.
This article provides a complete framework for researchers and drug development professionals to prevent RNA degradation during in situ hybridization (ISH) protocols. Covering foundational principles to advanced validation techniques, it details the critical roles of sample stabilization, proper fixation, and RNase-free workflows. The guide further explores optimized methodological choices for probes and buffers, systematic troubleshooting for common issues like low signal, and the implementation of rigorous controls to validate experimental results. By synthesizing current best practices and recent advancements, this resource aims to empower scientists to achieve highly sensitive, reliable, and reproducible RNA localization data.
What are the most common sources of RNase contamination in the laboratory? RNases are incredibly ubiquitous and resilient enzymes. The most common sources include:
Why are RNases so difficult to eliminate? Many RNases, such as those in the RNase A family, are structurally very robust. They possess numerous intramolecular disulfide bonds that make them refractory to many decontamination methods, can survive prolonged boiling or autoclaving, and do not require cofactors to function [1] [2].
How can I tell if my RNA sample has been degraded by RNases? RNA integrity can be assessed using several methods. While UV spectroscopy (A260/A280 ratio) indicates protein contamination, it does not directly show degradation. Tools like capillary electrophoresis provide an RNA Integrity Number (RIN), where a RIN of 10 is intact and a RIN below 7 indicates significant degradation. Gel electrophoresis can also show a smear instead of distinct ribosomal RNA bands, indicating degradation [3].
| Problem Scenario | Possible Root Cause | Recommended Solution |
|---|---|---|
| Weak or No ISH Signal | RNA degradation due to delayed fixation or RNase contamination during sample processing [5] [6]. | Handle tissue specimens carefully and ensure prompt fixation upon collection to limit RNA loss [5]. Use RNase-free reagents and wear gloves throughout the procedure. |
| High Background Staining in ISH | Incomplete stringent washing; section drying out during hybridization; or use of protein-based adhesives [5] [6]. | Standardize washing steps (duration, volume, agitation) [5]. Use a humidified chamber and ensure sections never dry out [6]. Avoid protein-based section adhesives on charged slides [5]. |
| Poor RNA Yields from Tissue | Inefficient homogenization or incomplete inactivation of endogenous RNases, especially in RNase-rich tissues (e.g., pancreas) [3]. | For difficult tissues, use a more rigorous, phenol-based RNA isolation method (e.g., TRIzol). Homogenize samples immediately in a chaotropic lysis solution [3]. |
| Inconsistent Results Between Users | Variable techniques in washing steps or reagent application by different operators [5]. | Implement standardized protocols for all critical steps, especially washing. Use good washing technique and ensure uniform distribution of reagents on the specimen surface [5]. |
The following protocol is essential for techniques like In Situ Hybridization (ISH) where preserving RNA integrity is critical. It synthesizes best practices from multiple expert sources [5] [1] [4].
Adhering to a regular decontamination schedule is crucial for long-term success [2].
| Item | Function | Key Considerations |
|---|---|---|
| RNase Decontamination Solutions (e.g., RNaseZap) | To rapidly and effectively remove RNases from work surfaces, equipment, and glassware. | Available as sprays or wipes for convenience. Essential for weekly and as-needed cleaning [3] [2]. |
| Diethyl Pyrocarbonate (DEPC) | A chemical that inactivates RNases in water and solutions by alkylating histidine residues. | Note: Cannot be used to treat Tris-based buffers. Must be removed by autoclaving after treatment, as it can modify RNA [1]. |
| RNase Inhibitor Proteins (Human Placenta or Murine) | Added enzymatic reactions (e.g., RT-PCR, in vitro transcription) to specifically inhibit RNase A-type enzymes. | The murine version is often more stable to oxidation. Requires a low concentration of DTT (<1 mM) to maintain activity [1]. |
| Chaotropic Salts (e.g., Guanidine Isothiocyanate) | Denature proteins and inactivate RNases upon sample lysis, protecting RNA during isolation. | A key component of many RNA isolation kits. Creates a harsh environment that denatures RNases [3] [4]. |
| RNA Stabilization Reagents (e.g., RNAlater, RNAprotect) | Permeate tissues/cells to stabilize RNA and inhibit RNase activity at room temperature for transport and storage. | Allows for flexibility in processing time. Ensure tissue pieces are small (<0.5 cm) for rapid penetration [3] [4]. |
The following diagram outlines the critical control points for preventing RNase contamination throughout a typical ISH workflow, from slide preparation to hybridization.
What are the fundamental reasons RNA is less stable than DNA? RNA is inherently less stable than DNA due to a key structural difference in its sugar molecule. The presence of a reactive 2'-hydroxyl group on ribose makes the phosphodiester bonds in RNA vulnerable to attack and cleavage, especially in alkaline environments or in the presence of catalytic metal ions like Ca²⁺. In fact, phosphodiester bonds in RNA are estimated to be 200 times less stable than those in DNA under neutral pH and physiological magnesium levels [8].
How does sample handling lead to RNA degradation in my ISH experiment? Ex vivo RNA degradation begins almost immediately after cell death or tissue collection. The rate of decay is strongly dependent on time to preservation and storage conditions [9]. During this period, uncontrolled RNase activity and chemical hydrolysis fragment the target RNA. In ISH, these fragments are either washed away during stringent washing steps or are too short to bind a sufficient number of probes, leading directly to a loss of detection signal [10] [9].
Can RNA degradation create misleading biological interpretations? Yes, this is a critical and often overlooked risk. Degradation does not affect all transcripts uniformly [9]. If the degradation rate of your target RNA differs from that of your control genes or other targets in a multiplex assay, it can create a false impression of differential gene expression. The primary technical signal in your data may become correlated with sample quality (e.g., RIN score) rather than the actual biological condition of interest, potentially leading to incorrect conclusions [9].
Does degradation only affect the target RNA, or can it impact the entire ISH assay? While target RNA integrity is paramount, degradation also compromises overall sample quality, which affects assay architecture. In degraded samples, you may observe a loss of library complexity and an increase in non-specific background, as the careful balance of probe binding and background suppression is disrupted [9].
Use the following table to diagnose and resolve common issues related to RNA degradation in ISH.
| Problem | Possible Cause | Solution |
|---|---|---|
| Weak or No Signal | Extensive degradation of target RNA due to slow fixation or improper tissue processing [11] [9]. | • Ensure fixation in fresh 10% NBF within 16-32 hours of collection [11] [12].• Qualify RNA integrity with control probes (e.g., PPIB, UBC) before running target assay [13] [12]. |
| High Background Noise | Non-specific binding of probes to fragmented RNA or exposed cellular components [10]. | • Optimize protease treatment time and temperature to avoid over-permeabilization [13] [12].• Always include a negative control probe (e.g., bacterial dapB) to assess non-specific background [13]. |
| Inconsistent Staining Between Samples | Variable RNA integrity across samples due to inconsistent pre-fixation delay or fixation times [9]. | • Standardize sample handling protocols across all samples.• For valuable but degraded samples, use a linear model framework to explicitly control for RIN score in analysis [9]. |
| Loss of Tissue Architecture | Over-permeabilization from excessive protease treatment used to compensate for suspected degradation. | • Follow recommended pretreatment protocols (e.g., 15 min ER2 at 95°C and 15 min Protease at 40°C on a BOND RX system) [12]. Adjust in small increments if needed [13]. |
This workflow is essential for qualifying your samples before attempting a full ISH assay, ensuring that RNA degradation does not compromise your results [13] [11] [12].
The process involves preparing tissue sections, performing the RNAscope assay with control probes, and then scoring the results to decide whether to proceed, optimize pre-treatment, or discard the sample.
1. Tissue Preparation and Sectioning
2. RNAscope Assay with Control Probes
3. Scoring and Interpretation
Table: RNAscope Scoring Guidelines for Assessing Sample Quality [13] [12]
| Score | Criteria (Dots per Cell) | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | No staining or <1 dot/10 cells | Unacceptable / Severe degradation |
| 1 | 1-3 dots/cell | Low signal / Potential degradation |
| 2 | 4-9 dots/cell; very few clusters | Acceptable for low-copy targets |
| 3 | 10-15 dots/cell; <10% in clusters | Good quality |
| 4 | >15 dots/cell; >10% in clusters | Excellent quality |
Table: Key Research Reagent Solutions for RNA Stabilization in ISH
| Item | Function | Key Consideration |
|---|---|---|
| Fresh 10% NBF | Cross-links and preserves RNA in tissue immediately after dissection. | Fixation time of 16-32 hours is critical; under-fixation causes RNA loss [11] [12]. |
| Superfrost Plus Slides | Provides electrostatic charge to firmly adhere tissue sections. | Prevents tissue detachment during rigorous washing steps, especially after permeabilization [13] [11]. |
| Positive Control Probes (PPIB, POLR2A, UBC) | Qualifies sample RNA integrity and assay performance. | Use to establish a baseline for acceptable signal before running valuable target samples [13] [12]. |
| Negative Control Probe (dapB) | Assesses non-specific background and false-positive signal. | A score of <1 indicates successful background suppression [13] [12]. |
| Protease (e.g., LS Protease III) | Permeabilizes tissue to allow probe access to target RNA. | Requires precise optimization; over-digestion damages tissue and RNA [13] [12]. |
| RNase Inhibitors | Protects RNA from enzymatic degradation during sample prep. | Essential in solutions used prior to fixation, but not required for the RNAscope assay itself post-fixation [13]. |
| Fresh Ethanol & Xylene | Dehydrates and cleans tissue during processing and post-hybridization washes. | Old or contaminated reagents can introduce nucleases or cause high background [13] [12]. |
Understanding the pathways of RNA degradation helps in identifying the root causes of ISH failure. The diagram below illustrates the two main pathways: chemical hydrolysis and enzymatic cleavage by RNases.
This technical support center guide explains why the immediate period after sample collection is most vulnerable for RNA degradation and provides actionable troubleshooting advice to ensure the success of your in situ hybridization (ISH) experiments.
RNA is highly susceptible to degradation by RNase enzymes, which are ubiquitous in the environment and are released from cellular compartments upon tissue collection [14]. The "sentinel principle" notes that blood contains molecular indicators of physiological changes, but these RNA biomarkers are highly dynamic and can change rapidly post-sampling if not stabilized [15].
The acceptable processing time varies by sample type and storage conditions. The following table summarizes key findings from recent studies:
| Sample Type | Storage Condition | Acceptable Processing Time | Key Quality Metric | Experimental Findings |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whole Blood [15] | 4°C | Up to 6 hours | RNA Integrity Number (RIN), Transcriptome Profile | RIN significantly lower after 24h; 515 genes showed differential transcript abundance after 24h vs. 1h. |
| Whole Blood [16] | 4°C | Up to 72 hours | RNA Integrity | RNA integrity qualified after 72 hours. |
| Whole Blood [16] | Room Temp (22-30°C) | Up to 2 hours | RNA Integrity | RNA integrity showed significant differences after 6 hours. |
| Ovine Placenta [17] | Post-expulsion, Snap Frozen | Variable (tested up to 6h post-delivery) | RNA Quality Number (RQN) | RQN was acceptable with snap-freezing; placental delivery timing did not affect RNA quality. |
Degraded RNA directly leads to weak or absent signals in ISH because the target molecules the probes bind to are destroyed [14] [18]. The RNAscope technology relies on intact RNA for probe binding, and degradation will result in low signal scores for positive control probes [19] [20].
This is often a direct result of RNA degradation during sample acquisition or handling.
| Possible Cause | Recommended Solution |
|---|---|
| Delayed or Improper Fixation | Fix tissue promptly after collection to prevent RNA degradation [21] [6]. For FFPE samples, use fresh 10% Neutral Buffered Formalin (NBF) for 16–32 hours at room temperature [19] [20]. |
| Ineffective Tissue Preservation | For tissues rich in RNases (e.g., placenta), snap-freezing in liquid nitrogen is more effective than RNAlater for preserving high-quality RNA (RQN 6.81 vs. 2.84) [17]. |
| Inadequate Permeabilization | Optimize protease digestion (e.g., Proteinase K). Insufficient digestion reduces hybridization signal, while over-digestion damages tissue morphology [14] [6]. |
| Sample RNA is Degraded | Always run positive control probes (e.g., PPIB, POLR2A) to verify sample RNA quality before attempting to detect your target [19] [20]. |
| Possible Cause | Recommended Solution |
|---|---|
| Insufficient Stringency Washes | Increase stringency by adjusting temperature and salt concentration in post-hybridization washes. For example, wash with 0.1-2x SSC at elevated temperatures (e.g., 25-75°C) to remove non-specifically bound probes [14] [6]. |
| Probe Binding to Repetitive Sequences | If your probe contains repetitive sequences, add a blocking agent like COT-1 DNA to the hybridization mix [6]. |
| Incomplete Blocking | Ensure adequate blocking with agents like BSA, milk, normal serum, or casein for 1-2 hours at room temperature before antibody incubation [14] [22]. |
| Tissue Drying | Ensure slides remain wet at all times during the procedure. Drying causes non-specific probe and antibody binding, leading to high background [14] [21]. |
This protocol is critical for verifying that your sample collection and preservation methods are successful before proceeding with costly ISH experiments [19] [20].
This methodology, adapted from a 2025 study on ovine placenta, can be applied to evaluate preservation methods for your specific tissue [17].
| Item | Function | Considerations |
|---|---|---|
| Liquid Nitrogen | For snap-freezing tissue to instantly halt RNase activity. | Gold standard for many tissues; preserves RNA quality effectively [17]. |
| RNAlater Solution | Stabilizes and protects RNA in tissues at room temperature. | Convenient for field work; performance may be tissue-dependent [17]. |
| Fresh 10% NBF | Cross-linking fixative that preserves tissue architecture and RNA. | Critical for FFPE-ISH; fixation time (16-32h) must be optimized [19] [20]. |
| Proteinase K | Digests proteins surrounding target nucleic acid to permit probe access. | Concentration and time require optimization for each tissue type [14] [6]. |
| Positive Control Probes (PPIB, POLR2A) | Verify sample RNA integrity and assay performance. | Species-specific probes are required [19] [20]. |
| Negative Control Probe (dapB) | Assess non-specific background staining. | A score of 0 is ideal [19] [20]. |
| SuperFrost Plus Slides | Provide superior tissue adhesion during multi-step ISH procedures. | Required for RNAscope to prevent tissue loss [19] [20]. |
| ImmEdge Hydrophobic Barrier Pen | Creates a barrier to keep reagents over the section and prevent drying. | Essential for manual RNAscope assays [19] [20]. |
The diagram below illustrates the critical decision points and recommended practices for preserving RNA integrity from the moment of sample collection.
In situ hybridization (ISH) is a powerful technique that enables researchers to visualize the spatial and temporal expression patterns of specific nucleic acid sequences directly within tissue samples. However, the integrity of both the endogenous cellular RNA and the delivered probes is constantly threatened by ribonuclease (RNase) activity, which can rapidly degrade RNA molecules and compromise experimental results. This technical support center provides comprehensive troubleshooting guides and FAQs to help you navigate these dual challenges and achieve reliable, reproducible ISH results.
1. What are the primary sources of RNase contamination in ISH experiments? RNase enzymes are found on glassware, in reagents, and on operators and their clothing. These enzymes quickly destroy any RNA in the cell or the RNA probe itself, making sterile techniques, gloves, and RNase-free solutions essential for preventing contamination of either the probe or tissue RNA [14].
2. Why is tissue handling and fixation so critical for preserving endogenous RNA? Careless handling of tissue specimens and delayed fixation encourage the loss of RNA by the action of endogenous RNases. To prevent RNA degradation, tissue samples should be handled with care and stored under conditions that inhibit RNase activity immediately after collection [14] [5]. Good quality fixation using known and consistent fixation conditions produces the best results [5].
3. What are the optimal storage conditions for protecting RNA integrity in tissue samples? For best results, do not store slides dry at room temperature. Instead, store them in 100% ethanol at -20°C, or in a plastic box covered in saran wrap at -20°C or -80°C. Such storage preserves slides for several years [14]. Common approaches include flash-freezing samples in liquid nitrogen immediately after collection or fixing them in formalin followed by paraffin embedding (FFPE) [14].
4. How does probe design influence stability and hybridization efficiency? RNA probes should be 250–1,500 bases in length, with probes of approximately 800 bases long exhibiting the highest sensitivity and specificity [14] [23]. If >5% of base pairs are not complementary to the target, the probe will only loosely hybridize and is more likely to be washed away during wash and detection steps [14].
5. What are the consequences of improper proteinase K digestion? Proteinase K digestion is a critical step for successful ISH. Insufficient digestion will result in a diminished hybridization signal, while over-digestion will result in poor tissue morphology, making localization of the hybridization signal very difficult [14] [23]. The optimal proteinase K concentration varies depending on the tissue type, length of fixation, and size of tissue [14].
| Potential Cause | Verification Method | Solution |
|---|---|---|
| RNA Degradation | Check RNA quality with positive controls [24] | Ensure prompt fixation and proper storage conditions; use RNase-free reagents [5] [25] |
| Inadequate Digestion | Perform proteinase K titration [23] | Optimize proteinase K concentration (1-5 µg/mL for 10 min is a good starting point) and incubation time [23] |
| Over-fixation | Test with different fixation times | Standardize fixation conditions; avoid excessive fixation times [18] |
| Suboptimal Hybridization | Check temperature with calibrated thermometer [6] | Optimize hybridization temperature (typically 55-62°C); ensure adequate hybridization time [14] [23] |
| Probe Quality | Test new probes on known positive sections [23] | Verify probe concentration, activity, and preservation; use appropriate dilution [18] |
| Potential Cause | Verification Method | Solution |
|---|---|---|
| Inadequate Washes | Check wash temperatures and solutions [6] | Perform stringent washes with appropriate SSC buffer (0.1-2x) at 75-80°C; ensure correct salt concentrations [14] [6] |
| Probe Contains Repetitive Sequences | Analyze probe sequence | Add blockers like COT-1 DNA during hybridization to prevent binding to repetitive sequences [6] |
| Drying of Sections | Visual inspection of slide edges | Prevent evaporation of probe solution during incubation; use humidified chamber [5] |
| Insufficient Blocking | Compare with proper controls | Extend blocking time (1-2 hours); ensure proper blocking buffer composition (MABT + 2% BSA, milk, or serum) [14] |
| Over-digestion | Assess tissue morphology | Reduce proteinase K concentration and/or incubation time to preserve tissue structure [23] |
| Potential Cause | Verification Method | Solution |
|---|---|---|
| Insufficient Fixation | Assess tissue adhesion | Optimize fixation by changing fixatives or increasing fixation time [18] |
| Excessive Digestion | Inspect tissue integrity under microscope | Reduce proteinase K digestion time and concentration [23] |
| Slide Adhesion Problems | Check for section lifting | Use charged slides; avoid protein-based adhesives that can block slide surface [5] |
| Improper Coverslip Removal | Visual inspection for torn tissue | Soak slides in washing buffer to gently remove coverslips [18] |
| Over-denaturation | Test different denaturation times | Precisely control denaturation time and temperature [18] |
| Reagent Category | Specific Examples | Function & Importance |
|---|---|---|
| RNase Inhibitors | RNase-free reagents, RNase inhibitors, DEPC-treated water | Protect RNA from degradation by ubiquitously present RNases during all experimental stages [14] [25] |
| Fixation Agents | Paraformaldehyde, formalin, 10% neutral buffered formalin (NBF) [23] | Preserve tissue architecture and immobilize nucleic acids; crucial for maintaining RNA integrity and morphology [14] [5] |
| Permeabilization Reagents | Proteinase K, pepsin, hydrochloric solution | Digest proteins surrounding target nucleic acids to increase probe accessibility [14] [6] [18] |
| Hybridization Components | Formamide, dextran sulfate, Denhardt's solution, SSC buffer | Create optimal environment for specific probe-target hybridization while minimizing non-specific binding [14] |
| Blocking Agents | BSA, milk, serum, COT-1 DNA [14] [6] | Reduce non-specific background staining by blocking repetitive sequences and non-specific binding sites [14] [6] |
| Detection Substrates | NBT/BCIP, DAB, Fast Red [6] | Enable visualization of hybridized probes through chromogenic or fluorescent reactions [6] |
The following diagram illustrates the ISH procedure with emphasis on the key stages where both endogenous RNA and delivered probes are most vulnerable to degradation, and where protective measures are most critical.
By implementing these comprehensive protection strategies throughout your ISH workflow, you can successfully navigate the dual challenge of preserving both endogenous cellular RNA and delivered probes, leading to more reliable, reproducible, and meaningful experimental results.
For researchers investigating gene expression through in situ hybridization (ISH), the integrity of the target nucleic acids is paramount. The choice of sample stabilization method at the point of collection is a critical first step that fundamentally determines the success of all downstream molecular analyses. This guide provides a detailed technical comparison between two primary stabilization methods—snap-freezing and immediate lysis buffer immersion—within the overarching thesis of preventing RNA degradation during ISH protocol research. It is designed to support researchers, scientists, and drug development professionals in making informed decisions and troubleshooting common experimental challenges.
The table below summarizes the core characteristics, advantages, and considerations of each method to guide your selection.
| Feature | Snap-Freezing | Immediate Lysis Buffer Immersion |
|---|---|---|
| Core Principle | Rapid cooling to -70°C or below to halt enzymatic activity [26] | Immediate immersion in a strongly denaturing chemical environment (chaotropic buffer) to inactivate RNases [26] |
| Primary Goal | Preserve tissue architecture and spatial information for histology [26] | Preserve molecular integrity for bulk analysis, sacrificing cellular structure [26] |
| Best Suited For | ISH, immunohistochemistry (IHC), spatial transcriptomics [26] [27] | RNA/DNA extraction for PCR, sequencing, blotting [26] |
| Key Advantage | Maintains morphological context; allows sectioning for localization studies [26] | Highest fidelity for RNA preservation; eliminates post-collection degradation [26] |
| Key Consideration | Ice crystal formation can distort tissue morphology if not performed optimally [26] | Tissue is dissolved; no possibility for subsequent histological examination or localization [26] |
| Optimal Protocol | Freeze in chilled isopentane or OCT compound for minimal artifact [26] | Submerge tissue in chaotropic lysis buffer before any physical disruption; do not allow to thaw [26] |
Slow freezing allows large ice crystals to form, which create cracks, enlarge intracellular spaces, and rupture cell membranes. This leads to poor tissue morphology, making the accurate localization of hybridization signals in ISH very difficult [26]. For optimal results, use a cryoprotectant like OCT compound and freeze by immersing in chilled isopentane rather than directly in liquid nitrogen, which can cause cracking due to rapid expansion [26].
Yes. Weak or absent signal can stem from RNA degradation that occurred before stabilization. Careless handling of tissue specimens and delayed fixation will encourage the loss of RNA by the action of endogenous RNases [5]. To prevent this, you must limit the time between animal sacrifice or tissue collection and immersion in your chosen stabilizing medium (either fixative, freezing medium, or lysis buffer). RNases are ubiquitous and act quickly [14].
When you are ready to extract RNA, do not allow the frozen tissue to thaw prior to submersion in lysis buffer [26]. The recommended practice is to fracture the still-frozen tissue by impact (while wrapped) and quickly transfer the frozen shards to a pre-cooled weigh boat. The mass of the tissue should be recorded while frozen, and the pieces should be transferred directly into lysis buffer, where they will thaw quickly in a denaturing environment [26].
While high background is often related to hybridization or washing stringency, sample processing can contribute. Incomplete removal of paraffin from FFPE sections during deparaffinization can cause poor staining [14]. Furthermore, if the tissue section dries out at any point during the pre-hybridization or hybridization steps, it can cause high, non-specific background staining [6] [18]. Always ensure sections are fully covered with liquid and use a properly sealed humidified chamber.
This depends on your experimental design. If you plan to perform ISH and qPCR on adjacent sections from the same tissue block, snap-freezing is the only viable option as it preserves tissue architecture. However, ensure the freezing method (e.g., OCT embedding in chilled isopentane) is optimized to minimize ice crystal artifacts [26]. If you are performing ISH on one set of samples and qPCR on another, you can stabilize the qPCR samples by snap-freezing followed by powderization in liquid nitrogen, or for maximum RNA quality, use immediate lysis buffer immersion [28].
| Reagent / Material | Function in Stabilization |
|---|---|
| Liquid Nitrogen | Provides extreme cold (-196°C) for rapid "snap-freezing" of samples [26]. |
| OCT Compound | A water-soluble embedding medium that acts as a cryoprotectant, reducing freezing artifacts for tissue sectioning [26]. |
| Isopentane (2-Methylbutane) | Chilled by liquid nitrogen, it provides a -70°C bath for rapid but controlled freezing, preventing cracking [26]. |
| Chaotropic Lysis Buffer | Contains strong denaturants (e.g., guanidinium thiocyanate) that instantly inactivate RNases and other enzymes [26]. |
| RNase-free Tubes and Tips | Prevents introduction of external RNases that can degrade sample RNA during handling [14]. |
| Proper Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) | Gloves and a lab coat prevent contamination of samples with RNases present on skin and clothing [14]. |
The following diagrams outline the standard protocols for each stabilization method and a logical framework for choosing between them.
For researchers conducting in situ hybridization (ISH), the choice of fixation method is a critical first step that fundamentally impacts the success of the entire experiment. Proper fixation preserves tissue morphology while maintaining the integrity and accessibility of nucleic acid targets. This guide provides a technical support framework to help you select and optimize fixation methods, troubleshoot common issues, and understand the alternatives to traditional formalin-based fixation to prevent RNA degradation in your ISH protocols.
1. Why is formalin fixation problematic for some molecular applications? Formalin (and its buffered form, NBF) works by creating cross-links between proteins and nucleic acids. While this excellently preserves tissue structure, these cross-links fragment nucleic acids, modify bases, and mask target sequences, making DNA and RNA less accessible for probe hybridization in ISH and resulting in lower yields and impaired amplification in downstream PCR. Formalin is also a known carcinogen, posing a health risk to users [29] [30].
2. What are the main advantages of non-crosslinking fixatives? Alcohol-based, non-crosslinking fixatives (e.g., FineFIX, RCL2) and preservatives (e.g., Streck Cell Preservative) do not create molecular cross-links. Studies show they provide superior DNA and RNA yield and quality compared to formalin. The resulting nucleic acids are longer, less fragmented, and more readily amplifiable, which is crucial for sensitive techniques like ISH, PCR, and next-generation sequencing. Given the higher yield, less starting material may be needed, making them ideal for biopsies [29] [30].
3. Can I use paraformaldehyde (PFA) for RNA in situ hybridization? Yes, paraformaldehyde is a common and effective fixative for RNA ISH protocols. Like formalin, it is a crosslinking fixative, but it is often preferred for its rapid penetration and effective preservation of cellular morphology and RNA integrity. It is crucial to use fresh, high-quality PFA solutions and control fixation time precisely to avoid over-fixation, which can make tissues impermeable to ISH probes [14] [22].
4. How can I stabilize RNA in fresh tissues before fixation or processing? For short-term storage or transport of fresh tissues, you can use RNA stabilization reagents like RNAlater. This solution permeates tissues to inactivate RNases, protecting RNA integrity for a day at 37°C, a week at 25°C, or longer at 4°C or -20°C. Alternatively, immediate snap-freezing in liquid nitrogen is effective, though frozen samples can be more cumbersome to handle without thawing [31] [32].
5. My tissue is already fixed in formalin. Can I still get good ISH results? Yes, successful ISH is routinely performed on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues. The key is optimizing the pre-hybridization steps to reverse cross-links and make the RNA accessible. This involves careful optimization of proteinase K digestion and heat-induced antigen retrieval steps. Running appropriate positive and negative control probes is essential to validate the protocol for your specific tissue block [14] [19].
The table below summarizes the key characteristics of different types of fixatives to help you make an informed choice.
Table 1: Comparison of Fixative Types for Nucleic Acid Preservation
| Fixative Type | Preservation Mechanism | Impact on Nucleic Acids | Best Suited For | Key Considerations |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Formalin/NBF [29] [30] | Crosslinking | Fragments DNA/RNA, crosslinks, lower yield | Routine histology, IHC, ISH (with optimization) | Requires antigen retrieval; health hazard |
| Paraformaldehyde (PFA) [22] | Crosslinking | Better preservation than formalin, but can still mask targets | ISH, electron microscopy, immunocytochemistry | Use fresh solutions; control fixation time |
| Alcohol-based (e.g., FineFIX, RCL2) [29] | Non-crosslinking (precipitation) | Higher DNA/RNA yield and quality, longer fragments | Molecular assays (PCR, sequencing), ISH | May not preserve morphology as well as crosslinkers |
| Streck Cell Preservative (SCP) [30] | Non-crosslinking (proprietary) | Preserves nucleic acid integrity and amplifiability | Flow cytometry, FISH, PCR, NGS | Formalin-free; good for nucleic acid applications |
Problem: Weak or No Signal in ISH
Problem: High Background Staining
Problem: Poor Tissue Morphology or Tissue Loss
Problem: Degraded RNA
Table 2: Essential Reagents for Nucleic Acid Preservation and ISH
| Reagent / Material | Function | Example Use Case |
|---|---|---|
| RNAlater / DNA/RNA Shield [31] [32] | Stabilizes RNA in fresh tissues/cells by inactivating nucleases. | Field sampling; stabilizing clinical biopsies before RNA extraction. |
| Proteinase K [14] [22] | Enzymatically digests proteins to permeabilize tissue and reverse cross-links. | Critical step in ISH for making target RNA accessible to probes in FFPE tissues. |
| Antigen Retrieval Buffers (e.g., Citrate, EDTA) [19] | Uses heat and pH to break protein cross-links and expose epitopes/targets. | Unmasking nucleic acid targets in formalin-fixed tissues for ISH or IHC. |
| Formamide & SSC Buffer [14] [22] | Key components of hybridization and wash buffers that control stringency. | Managing probe binding specificity during ISH hybridization and washes. |
| Blocking Agents (BSA, Casein, serum) [14] [22] | Reduces non-specific binding of probes and detection antibodies. | Lowering background signal in ISH and IHC. |
| Superfrost Plus Slides [19] | Microscope slides with an charged adhesive coating. | Preventing tissue detachment during multi-step ISH procedures. |
The diagram below outlines a logical pathway for selecting and validating a fixation strategy for your ISH experiments, particularly when sample history is unknown.
This protocol is adapted from standard ISH methods for using DIG-labeled RNA probes on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) sections [14].
Stage 1: Deparaffinization and Rehydration
Stage 2: Antigen Retrieval and Permeabilization
Stage 3: Hybridization
Stage 4: Stringency Washes
Stage 5: Immunological Detection
For long-term storage of unprocessed tissue samples intended for RNA in situ hybridization (ISH), freezing at -80°C is recommended to prevent RNA degradation [34]. If tissues are fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE), the resulting blocks can be stored at room temperature for extended periods [14].
The optimal storage method depends on whether the slides are unstained or have already been through the ISH procedure:
Tissue detachment often occurs due to inadequate slide adhesion or harsh treatment during the protocol. To prevent this:
Preventing RNA degradation requires vigilance at every step:
| Potential Cause | Solution |
|---|---|
| Incomplete blocking during the ISH protocol. | Ensure blocking steps are performed with appropriate buffers (e.g., containing BSA, serum, or casein) for the recommended duration [14] [22]. |
| Insufficient stringency washes after hybridization. | Perform post-hybridization washes with the correct SSC concentration and temperature to remove loosely bound probes [14] [22] [34]. |
| Probe concentration too high. | Titrate your probe to find the optimal concentration (e.g., 0.5-2 µg/mL for mRNA ISH). Excessive probe increases background noise [34]. |
| Slides dried out during hybridization. | Always use a properly sealed, humidified chamber during long incubation steps to prevent evaporation, which causes high, non-specific staining at the edges [5]. |
| Potential Cause | Solution |
|---|---|
| RNA degradation due to improper storage or handling. | Ensure tissues are fixed promptly and stored at the correct temperature. Use RNase-free conditions throughout [5] [34]. |
| Over-fixed or under-fixed tissue. | Optimize fixation time for your specific tissue type. Over-fixation can mask the target, while under-fixation fails to preserve RNA [5]. |
| Insufficient permeabilization. | Optimize the proteinase K concentration (e.g., 1-20 µg/mL) and digestion time. Excessive digestion damages tissue, while insufficient digestion blocks probe access [14] [34]. |
| Incorrect hybridization temperature. | Calculate and use the appropriate hybridization temperature based on your probe's GC content. Too high a temperature denatures the probe, while too low increases non-specific binding [34]. |
The table below summarizes key recommendations for storing different materials used in ISH workflows.
| Material Type | Short-Term Storage | Long-Term Storage | Key Considerations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unprocessed Tissue | -20°C [34] | -80°C [34] | Freeze in liquid nitrogen immediately after collection. |
| Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded (FFPE) Blocks | Room temperature [14] | Room temperature [14] | Stable for many years. |
| Unstained FFPE Sections (on slides) | 4°C [35] | 4°C [35] | Store in a slide box. Bake fresh slides before use for better adhesion [36]. |
| Cryosections (on slides) | -20°C [34] | -80°C [34] | Store in 100% ethanol at -20°C as an alternative [14]. |
| Stained Slides (Chromogenic) | Room temperature (darkness) [14] | Room temperature (darkness) [14] | Use a permanent mounting medium. |
| Stained Slides (Fluorescent) | -20°C (darkness) [37] | -80°C (darkness) [37] | Use an antifade mounting medium to slow photobleaching. |
| Item | Function | Example & Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Charged/Coated Slides | Chemically modified to create a positive charge that strongly binds negatively charged tissues, preventing detachment. | Superfrost Plus Slides [13] [35]. VECTABOND Reagent for creating your own coated slides [36]. |
| Hydrophobic Barrier Pen | Creates a water-repellent circle around the tissue section, allowing for smaller reagent volumes and preventing cross-contamination. | ImmEdge Pen is stable through high-temperature steps and will not wash away [13]. |
| Antifade Mounting Medium | Preserves fluorescence signal in FISH slides by reducing photobleaching during microscopy and storage. | Various commercial products available; often contain DAPI for nuclear counterstaining [37] [34]. |
| RNase Inhibitors | Protects RNA in tissues and solutions from degradation by RNase enzymes. | RNasin can be added to solutions. DEPC-treated water is used to prepare RNase-free buffers [34]. |
The following diagram outlines a logical pathway for deciding the appropriate storage method for your samples, based on the search results.
Ribonucleases (RNases) are stable, ubiquitous enzymes that rapidly degrade RNA and pose a significant threat to experiments like in situ hybridization (ISH) [14] [38]. Because RNases require no cofactors and are present on skin, dust, and laboratory surfaces, establishing a dedicated RNase-free workspace is not just a recommendation but a fundamental requirement for obtaining reliable results [39] [4]. This guide provides detailed best practices and troubleshooting advice to help researchers effectively prevent RNA degradation, ensuring the integrity of their ISH protocols and the accuracy of their gene expression data.
Q1: Why is a dedicated RNase-free workspace critical for ISH experiments?
RNA's single-stranded structure makes it inherently susceptible to degradation by RNases [38]. These enzymes are found everywhere—on skin, glassware, reagents, and in the air [14]. A dedicated workspace minimizes the risk of introducing these contaminants, which can destroy both the target RNA in your tissue samples and the RNA probes used for detection, leading to complete experimental failure [14] [4].
Q2: Can't I just use autoclaving to make my solutions and glassware RNase-free?
No, autoclaving alone is insufficient to eliminate RNases [39]. While autoclaving is a useful step, the extreme stability of RNases requires additional measures. Glassware should be baked at 180°C for at least 4 hours, and solutions (except for Tris-based buffers) should be treated with 0.1% diethylpyrocarbonate (DEPC) overnight, followed by autoclaving to hydrolyze any unreacted DEPC [39] [38].
Q3: What are the first steps I should take to create an RNase-free zone?
Begin by designating a special area for RNA work only [39] [4]. Before starting, wipe down all surfaces, including benches and equipment, with an RNase-inactivating agent or 100% ethanol [39]. Use sterile, disposable plasticware whenever possible, as it is typically RNase-free and eliminates the need for complex treatments [39] [4].
| Problem Symptom | Potential Cause | Solution |
|---|---|---|
| No or weak ISH signal | RNase degradation of target RNA or probe during experiment [14] | Use fresh, DEPC-treated solutions; wear gloves at all times and change them frequently; use RNase inhibitors in solutions [39] [34] |
| High background staining in ISH | Introduction of RNases or other contaminants causing non-specific binding [6] | Ensure all wash buffers are prepared with DEPC-treated water [34]; avoid letting slides dry out during the protocol [6] |
| Inconsistent RNA yield/quality | RNase contamination from samples, reagents, or equipment [4] | Dedicate a set of reagents for RNA work only; clean homogenizers and tools between samples; use lysis buffers with RNase inhibitors [4] |
| Degraded RNA after storage | Improper storage conditions activating RNases or causing hydrolysis [4] | Store purified RNA aliquots at -70°C to -80°C; for tissue samples, flash-freeze in liquid nitrogen and store at -70°C [39] [4] |
Proper treatment of reusable equipment is essential to prevent the introduction of RNases.
Most solutions used in RNA work must be specially treated to inactivate RNases.
| Item | Function in Maintaining RNase-Free Conditions |
|---|---|
| DEPC (Diethylpyrocarbonate) | An RNase-inactivating agent used to treat water and most aqueous solutions before autoclaving [39] [38]. |
| RNase-Decontamination Sprays/Solutions | Ready-to-use commercial products for quickly wiping down benches, equipment, and glassware [38]. |
| RNase Inhibitors (e.g., RNasin, Protector) | Added to enzymatic reactions and solutions to protect RNA from degradation by a broad spectrum of RNases during experiments [39] [34]. |
| Disposable RNase-Free Plasticware | Pre-sterilized pipette tips, microcentrifuge tubes, and other plasticware that require no pretreatment [39] [4]. |
| RNA Stabilization Reagents (e.g., RNAprotect) | Added during or immediately after sample collection to stabilize RNA and halt nuclease activity before extraction [4]. |
The following diagram illustrates the sequential steps for creating and maintaining an RNase-free environment, from personal preparation to long-term sample storage.
Vigilance and consistency are the cornerstones of maintaining an RNase-free workspace. By integrating the practices outlined above—designating a specific area, meticulously treating equipment and reagents, using proper personal protective equipment, and adhering to strict sample handling protocols—researchers can create a robust defense against RNase contamination. This foundation is critical for the success of sensitive techniques like ISH, ultimately ensuring the reliability and reproducibility of your research data.
What are the main types of probes used in RNA in situ hybridization (ISH), and how do I choose?
The main probe types are RNA probes (riboprobes) and DNA oligonucleotide probes. Your choice depends on your need for sensitivity and specificity.
How does probe design impact the success of the hybridization?
Two critical factors are probe length and hybridization conditions.
What controls are necessary to validate probe specificity?
Always run control probes to confirm your signal is specific [19].
What are the best practices for storing purified RNA and RNA probes?
The overarching goal is to create an RNase-free environment and prevent degradation by RNases, which are ubiquitous and stable enzymes [39] [4].
How should I store tissue samples to preserve RNA for future ISH experiments?
Standard storage of Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded (FFPE) blocks at room temperature leads to significant RNA degradation over time, drastically reducing ISH signals [41]. To preserve RNA integrity:
Are there solutions for storing RNA at room temperature?
Yes, specialized products are available. RNAstable is a storage medium that uses an anhydrobiosis principle to protect purified RNA samples in a dry state at room temperature for at least several weeks without compromising quality for downstream applications like microarrays [43].
Problem: High background or non-specific signal.
Problem: Weak or absent target signal.
Problem: Signal degradation over multiple rounds of imaging (in sequential FISH).
Table: Essential Reagents for RNA Integrity and ISH
| Reagent | Function | Key Considerations |
|---|---|---|
| DEPC/DMPC [39] | Inactivates RNases in water and buffers. | Cannot be used with Tris buffers. Must be autoclaved after treatment to hydrolyze excess reagent. |
| RNase Inhibitors (e.g., Protector) [39] | Protects RNA from degradation during isolation and reactions. | Effective against a broad spectrum of RNases. Maintain reducing conditions (DTT) for activity. |
| RNAlater [42] | Stabilizes and protects RNA in fresh tissues prior to fixation or freezing. | Permeates tissue to stabilize RNA instantly. Allows storage at 4°C for ~1 month or -20°C for years. |
| RNAstable [43] | Protects purified RNA in a dry state for room-temperature storage. | Based on anhydrobiosis. Ideal for shipping or archiving purified RNA without cold chain. |
| Formamide [14] [40] | Denaturant in hybridization buffers. Helps control stringency. | Concentration and temperature are key optimization variables for probe hybridization. |
| Proteinase K [14] | Digests proteins to permeabilize tissue for probe access. | Requires careful titration; concentration and time are tissue-dependent. |
The following diagram illustrates the critical steps for ensuring RNA and probe stability throughout a typical ISH experiment, from sample collection to imaging.
Figure 1. Sample and Probe Integrity Workflow: This chart outlines the key decision points for preserving your samples and probes. Steps highlighted in red are critical for preventing RNA degradation.
The diagram below summarizes the mechanism of action for different probe types used in RNA FISH.
Figure 2. RNA FISH Probe Technologies: Different probe systems offer varying levels of sensitivity and specificity for detecting RNA molecules within cells.
For researchers using in situ hybridization (ISH), RNA integrity within tissue samples is a paramount concern. Successful detection and localization of target nucleic acids hinge on the quality of the RNA, which can be compromised by a host of factors from sample collection to the final staining steps. This technical support center provides a targeted troubleshooting guide and FAQs to help you diagnose, prevent, and rectify issues related to RNA degradation, ensuring the reliability of your ISH experiments within the broader context of your research on preventing RNA degradation during ISH protocol development.
A systematic approach combining control probes, quantitative metrics, and morphological checks is the most reliable way to diagnose RNA integrity. The table below outlines the key methods and their interpretation.
Table: Methods for Assessing RNA Integrity in ISH Context
| Method | Description | Interpretation of Optimal Results |
|---|---|---|
| Control Probes (e.g., RNAscope) [12] [19] | Use of positive control probes (e.g., PPIB, POLR2A, UBC) and a negative control probe (e.g., bacterial dapB) on your sample. | Positive control should show strong, specific signal (e.g., PPIB score ≥2); negative control should show little to no signal (dapB score <1). |
| RNA Quality Scoring [12] [19] | Semi-quantitative scoring of control probe signals based on dots per cell. | Score 0: No staining.Score 1: 1-3 dots/cell.Score 2: 4-9 dots/cell.Score 3: 10-15 dots/cell.Score 4: >15 dots/cell. |
| Spectrophotometry (e.g., NanoDrop) [45] | UV absorbance measurements at 260nm, 280nm, and 230nm. | A260/A280 ratio ~1.8-2.2; A260/A230 ratio >1.7. Deviations indicate protein or chemical contamination. |
| Microfluidics (e.g., Bioanalyzer) [45] | Electrophoretic separation of RNA to generate an RNA Integrity Number (RIN). | RIN scale of 1-10; a higher RIN (e.g., >7) indicates better RNA integrity. |
The following workflow provides a logical pathway for diagnosing RNA quality issues in your samples:
Poor RNA quality in ISH typically manifests as weak or absent target signal and high background in negative controls. The root causes often lie in pre-analytical steps.
Table: Troubleshooting Common RNA Quality Issues in ISH
| Problem | Potential Causes | Solutions & Optimization Strategies |
|---|---|---|
| Weak or No Signal | • Delayed or inadequate fixation [5] [46]• Over-fixation (e.g., >32 hours in NBF) [46]• Extended storage of blocks/slides [46]• Incomplete protease digestion or antigen retrieval [12] [6] | • Fix tissues promptly (<30min post-collection) in 10% NBF for 16-32 hours [19] [46].• For over-fixed tissue, extend protease and retrieval times incrementally [12] [19].• Use freshly cut slides; store at -20°C or -80°C for long-term [46].• Optimize protease concentration and incubation time via titration [14] [6]. |
| High Background/Non-specific Signal | • Tissue drying during assay [12] [6]• Inadequate post-hybridization washes [6]• Over-digestion with protease [6]• Probe binding to repetitive sequences [6] | • Ensure slides never dry out; maintain humidity [12] [19].• Perform stringent washes with appropriate SSC buffer and temperature (e.g., 75-80°C) [6].• Titrate protease to balance signal and morphology [14].• For custom probes, add COT-1 DNA to block repetitive sequences [6]. |
| Poor Tissue Morphology | • Over-digestion with protease [14] [6]• Under-fixation [46] | • Reduce protease incubation time or concentration [14].• Ensure standard fixation protocols are followed [5] [46]. |
The relationship between common problems and their solutions in the experimental workflow can be visualized as follows:
Q1: Is an RNase-free environment necessary for RNAscope and other modern ISH assays? For the RNAscope assay specifically, an RNase-free environment is not required after tissue fixation, as fixation in 10% Neutral Buffered Formalin (NBF) deactivates endogenous RNases [12] [19] [46]. However, for other ISH methods, particularly those using frozen tissues, maintaining an RNase-free environment using dedicated reagents, consumables, and gloves is critical to prevent RNA degradation [45] [14].
Q2: How does tissue fixation time impact RNA quality and what is the optimal duration? Fixation time is critical. Under-fixation fails to preserve RNA and tissue structure, while over-fixation (exceeding 32 hours) can mask nucleic acids, making them inaccessible to probes and requiring harsher pretreatment that can damage RNA [46]. The recommended guideline is fixation in a sufficient volume of fresh 10% NBF for 16-32 hours at room temperature [19] [46].
Q3: Can I use ISH on decalcified or archived tissue samples? While possible, ISH on decalcified tissues is challenging as decalcifying agents compromise RNA quality [46]. For archived FFPE samples, RNA integrity decreases over time, especially for blocks stored at room temperature for over 5 years [46]. Storage at lower temperatures (e.g., -20°C) is recommended for long-term preservation. Always run control probes to qualify such samples before using precious target probes [12] [46].
Q4: What is the most critical step to prevent RNA degradation during sample preparation? The most critical step is immediate and proper stabilization of RNA after sample collection. This can be achieved by either immediately freezing samples in liquid nitrogen or, more effectively for morphology, promptly placing them in an adequate volume of fixative (10% NBF) to inactivate RNases [45] [5] [46]. Using RNA stabilization reagents like RNAlater is also an excellent option [45].
Table: Key Research Reagent Solutions for RNA-Sensitive Work
| Reagent/Tool | Function | Example & Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Positive & Negative Control Probes | Qualify sample RNA and assay performance. Essential for troubleshooting. | RNAscope PPIB/POLR2A/UBC (pos.) and dapB (neg.) [12] [19]. Stellaris ShipReady probes [47]. |
| RNA Stabilization Reagents | Inactivate RNases immediately upon sample collection. | RNAlater solution [45]. Flash-freezing in liquid nitrogen [45]. |
| Protease Enzymes | Permeabilize fixed tissue to allow probe access to RNA. | Proteinase K [14], Pepsin [6]. Requires titration to avoid over-/under-digestion [14] [6]. |
| Signal Detection Kits | Visualize hybridized probes. | Must match probe label and assay. RNAscope uses specific detection kits [12] [19]. |
| Mounting Media | Preserve signal and morphology for microscopy. | Must be assay-specific (e.g., xylene-based for Brown, VectaMount for Red) [12]. Incorrect media can dissolve signal [19] [6]. |
| Hydrophobic Barrier Pen | Creates a well around tissue, preventing reagent evaporation and sample drying. | ImmEdge Pen (Vector Laboratories) is specified for RNAscope [12] [19]. |
This protocol is adapted from the recommended workflow for the RNAscope assay [12] [19] and serves as a best-practice guide for any ISH experiment to validate RNA integrity.
Objective: To confirm that the RNA in a test sample is well-preserved and accessible for hybridization, ensuring subsequent experimental results are reliable.
Materials:
Method:
Weak or absent signal is one of the most common challenges in in situ hybridization (ISH). Accurate diagnosis of the failure root cause—whether due to RNA degradation, inadequate permeabilization, or probe failure—is essential for effective troubleshooting. This guide provides a structured framework and experimental protocols to help you systematically identify and resolve the source of low signal in your ISH experiments, ensuring reliable gene expression analysis.
The following diagram outlines the logical workflow for diagnosing the cause of low signal in your ISH experiment. Follow the path based on your control results to identify the most likely issue.
Answer: Use a positive control probe targeting a ubiquitously expressed and stable housekeeping gene.
Answer: Use a dedicated sample readiness probe or analyze positive control signal patterns.
Answer: This points to a problem specific to your experimental probe.
Answer: Several steps are crucial for signal strength, and errors in any of them can lead to failure.
This protocol utilizes specialized reagents to validate sample preparation before starting a full ISH workflow [48].
This protocol is essential for optimizing the permeabilization step in traditional ISH, which is critical for probe access [14].
| Symptom | Positive Control Result | Sample Readiness/Universal Control Result | Most Likely Cause | Solution |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low target signal | Strong, uniform signal | Not performed | Probe failure or poor probe design | Verify probe storage, test a new aliquot, check probe design [49]. |
| Low target signal | Strong, uniform signal | Strong, uniform signal | Target-specific issue | Check probe specificity and hybridization conditions [14] [40]. |
| Low signal on all probes | Weak/absent signal | Weak/absent signal | RNA degradation or major protocol failure | Check sample fixation, storage, and all reagent incubation steps [14] [13] [6]. |
| Weak, patchy signal on all probes | Weak signal | Weak signal | Poor permeabilization | Optimize proteinase K digestion time and concentration [14]. |
When using RNAscope technology, semi-quantitative scoring of positive control probes helps qualify your sample. Score the number of dots per cell, not intensity [13].
| Score | Staining Criteria | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | No staining or <1 dot/ 10 cells | Unacceptable - Sample or assay failed |
| 1 | 1-3 dots/cell | Low signal - Sample quality may be suboptimal |
| 2 | 4-9 dots/cell. None or very few dot clusters | Acceptable for medium-to-high abundance targets |
| 3 | 10-15 dots/cell and <10% dots are in clusters | Good quality |
| 4 | >15 dots/cell and >10% dots are in clusters | Excellent quality |
For a sample to be considered qualified, the positive control (e.g., PPIB) should have a score of ≥2, and the negative control (dapB) should have a score of <1 [13].
| Reagent / Material | Function | Key Considerations |
|---|---|---|
| HCR Sample Readiness Probe [48] | Universal positive control to assess sample permeabilization and RNA integrity. | Works with any HCR assay; provides a fast QC check before committing to target probes. |
| Positive Control Probes (PPIB, POLR2A, UBC) [13] | Probes for housekeeping genes to verify overall RNA quality and assay performance. | Use low-copy (PPIB, POLR2A) or high-copy (UBC) genes as benchmarks. |
| Negative Control Probe (dapB) [13] | Bacterial gene probe that should not hybridize to human/animal tissue; checks for non-specific background. | A score of <1 is acceptable; higher scores indicate background issues. |
| Proteinase K [14] | Enzyme used to digest proteins and permeabilize the tissue for probe access. | Requires optimization for each tissue type; concentration and time are critical. |
| Superfrost Plus Slides [13] | Microscope slides with an charged coating to ensure tissue adhesion throughout the stringent ISH protocol. | Required for some commercial assays (e.g., RNAscope) to prevent tissue detachment. |
| ImmEdge Hydrophobic Barrier Pen [13] | Used to create a barrier around the tissue section, keeping it hydrated and preventing reagent evaporation. | Essential for maintaining proper humidity and preventing slides from drying out. |
A step-by-step guide to mastering the critical pre-hybridization step for clear, reproducible ISH results.
Optimizing the proteinase K digestion step is one of the most critical factors for successful in situ hybridization (ISH). This pre-treatment balance is delicate: under-digestion limits probe access to the target RNA, resulting in a weak or absent signal, while over-digestion degrades tissue morphology and can destroy the target RNA itself, making signal localization impossible [14] [50] [51]. This guide provides detailed protocols and troubleshooting advice to fine-tune this essential step within the broader context of preserving RNA integrity.
Q: What are the consequences of incorrect Proteinase K digestion? A: The effects are twofold and sit on opposite ends of a spectrum:
Q: My tissue was fixed for too long or too short a time. How does this affect pre-treatment? A: The fixation history of your sample directly dictates the required pre-treatment stringency [5].
Q: What is a good starting point for a Proteinase K titration experiment? A general starting range for ISH applications is 1-5 µg/mL of Proteinase K for 10 minutes at room temperature [51]. For paraffin-embedded sections, another common starting point is 20 µg/mL for 10-20 minutes at 37°C [14]. The optimal condition within these ranges must be determined empirically for your specific tissue and fixation conditions.
Relying on a single, generic protocol often leads to suboptimal results. The following quantitative approach, based on a titration experiment, is the most reliable path to success.
Table 1: Proteinase K Titration Experiment Parameters
| Condition # | Proteinase K Concentration | Incubation Time | Expected Outcomes & Potential Issues |
|---|---|---|---|
| Condition 1 (Mild) | 1 µg/mL | 10 min (RT) | Potential under-digestion; weak signal but good morphology. |
| Condition 2 (Moderate) | 5 µg/mL | 10 min (RT) | Often a good balance; strong signal with preserved morphology [51]. |
| Condition 3 (Strong) | 20 µg/mL | 10 min (37°C) | Risk of over-digestion; may see signal loss & morphology damage [14]. |
| Condition 4 (Very Strong) | 20 µg/mL | 20 min (37°C) | High risk of over-digestion; used for heavily over-fixed tissues [14]. |
Abbreviations: RT, Room Temperature.
This protocol helps you identify the optimal pre-treatment conditions for your specific tissue samples.
Materials Needed:
Method:
Use the following flowchart to diagnose and correct issues related to your Proteinase K pre-treatment step.
Table 2: Key Reagents for ISH Pre-Treatment and Optimization
| Reagent | Function / Purpose | Considerations for Use |
|---|---|---|
| Proteinase K | A broad-spectrum serine protease that digests proteins surrounding the nucleic acids, enabling probe access [14] [51]. | Concentration and time are critical and must be optimized; always use a controlled temperature (e.g., 37°C) [14]. |
| Tris-HCl Buffer | Provides a stable pH environment for the Proteinase K reaction, typically around pH 7.5 [14] [22]. | Buffer pH and composition can affect enzyme activity. |
| Formalin / NBF (10%) | The recommended fixative for most ISH protocols. It cross-links proteins to preserve tissue architecture and nucleic acids [50] [5]. | Fixation time (16-32 hrs) is crucial; under- or over-fixation directly impacts required Proteinase K digestion [50]. |
| Digoxigenin-labeled Probes | A non-radioactive label for probes. Highly sensitive and specific, with low background as it is not endogenous to animal tissues [14] [51]. | Detected with an anti-digoxigenin antibody conjugated to a reporter enzyme (AP or HRP) [14] [6]. |
| SSC Buffer (20X) | Saline-sodium citrate buffer used in post-hybridization washes. Stringency is controlled by adjusting concentration (e.g., 0.1x-2x) and temperature [14] [22]. | Higher temperature and lower SSC concentration increase stringency, removing non-specifically bound probe [14]. |
Mastering the pre-treatment step is fundamental to a robust ISH protocol. By understanding the principles behind proteinase K digestion, systematically optimizing it for your specific samples, and using the appropriate controls and reagents, you can consistently achieve high-quality, publication-ready results that accurately reflect the spatial localization of your target RNA.
1. What causes high background staining in my ISH experiment? High background, or nonspecific staining, can arise from multiple sources. Probe-related causes include over-digestion of tissue by proteases, which damages morphology and increases nonspecific probe trapping [14]. Using a probe concentration that is too high can also saturate specific binding sites and cause excess probe to bind nonspecifically [46]. Immunodetection issues are another common source, such as incomplete blocking of the tissue section or using an incorrect antibody concentration [14]. Furthermore, insufficiently stringent post-hybridization washes fail to remove probe molecules that are loosely or nonspecifically bound to off-target sequences [46].
2. How do stringency washes work to reduce background? Stringency washes reduce background by removing imperfectly matched probe-target hybrids and probes that are bound nonspecifically. They work by manipulating two key factors: temperature and salt concentration [52].
3. My background is still high after adjusting wash stringency. What else should I check? If stringency washes do not resolve the issue, the problem may lie with your blocking step. Ensure you are using an effective blocking agent like BSA, milk, or serum, and that the blocking time is sufficient (typically 1-2 hours) [14]. Also, verify that your slides did not dry out at any point after the hybridization step began, as drying causes massive nonspecific binding of the antibody and high background [14]. Finally, re-optimize your proteinase K digestion time and concentration, as both under-digestion and over-digestion can lead to poor signal-to-noise ratios [14].
4. How can I prevent RNA degradation that might be mistaken for background? Preventing RNA degradation starts with proper tissue handling. Fix tissues as soon as possible after collection using 10% neutral buffered formalin [46]. For storage, keep FFPE blocks in a cool, dry place. For mounted slides, avoid storing them dry at room temperature; instead, store them in 100% ethanol at -20°C or in a sealed container at -80°C to preserve RNA integrity for years [14]. Always use reagents certified to be nuclease-free to avoid introducing RNases during the procedure [53].
| Problem Area | Specific Issue | Recommended Solution |
|---|---|---|
| Probe & Hybridization | Probe concentration too high [46] | Titrate the probe to find the optimal concentration. |
| Hybridization temperature too low [53] | Increase the hybridization temperature; for RNA probes, this is often between 60-65°C [53]. | |
| Nonspecific probe sequences | Check probe design for unique, specific sequences and include negative control probes [24]. | |
| Stringency Washes | Low wash temperature / high salt concentration [52] | Increase temperature and decrease salt concentration (e.g., use 0.1x SSC) in post-hybridization washes [14] [52]. |
| Immunodetection | Inadequate blocking [14] | Ensure a 1-2 hour block with 2% BSA, milk, or serum in MABT buffer before antibody application [14]. |
| Antibody concentration too high | Titrate the anti-label antibody according to the datasheet recommendation [14]. | |
| Slides dried during assay [14] | Maintain slides in a humidified chamber from hybridization until after the final wash before detection. | |
| Tissue & Sample Prep | Over-digestion with proteinase K [14] | Perform a proteinase K titration experiment to optimize time and concentration for your tissue type [14]. |
| Poor RNA integrity [46] | Check tissue fixation time (24±12 hours is optimal) [46] and ensure proper storage of blocks/slides [14]. |
This protocol is adapted from standard ISH methods [14].
Materials Needed:
Methodology:
This step is crucial for minimizing nonspecific antibody binding [14].
Materials Needed:
Methodology:
| Item | Function in ISH | Key Considerations |
|---|---|---|
| Formamide | Lowers the effective melting temperature (Tm) of nucleic acid hybrids, allowing high-stringency hybridization at manageable temperatures [53]. | Use molecular biology grade, deionized formamide [53]. |
| Saline Sodium Citrate (SSC) | A common salt buffer component. The concentration (e.g., 2x vs. 0.1x) is a primary factor in controlling wash stringency [14] [52]. | Prepare a 20x stock (3 M NaCl, 0.3 M sodium citrate, pH 5) and dilute as needed [14]. |
| Proteinase K | A protease that digests proteins to permeabilize the tissue and allow probe access to the target nucleic acid [14]. | Requires optimization. Titrate concentration and time (e.g., 10-20 min at 37°C) to balance signal and morphology [14]. |
| Blocking Agent (BSA, Milk, Serum) | Proteins used to "block" nonspecific binding sites on the tissue section before antibody application, reducing background [14]. | Ensure the blocking agent is compatible with your detection system. |
| Maleic Acid Buffer with Tween 20 (MABT) | A gentle wash buffer used after hybridization and before immunodetection. It is less harsh than PBS for nucleic acid detection [14]. | Recipe: 58 g maleic acid, 43.5 g NaCl, 55 g Tween-20 per 1L, pH to 7.5 with Tris base [14]. |
The following diagram outlines the logical workflow for diagnosing and resolving high background issues in ISH experiments.
Q1: What are the most critical steps to prevent RNA degradation when working with FFPE tissues? Proper sample storage and handling are paramount. To prevent RNA degradation, tissue samples should be flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen immediately after collection or fixed in fresh 10% neutral-buffered formalin. For long-term storage of FFPE blocks or slides, ensure a cool, dry environment and avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. For mounted slides, avoid dry storage at room temperature; instead, store them in 100% ethanol at -20°C or in a sealed plastic box at -80°C to preserve RNA integrity for several years [14].
Q2: How can I reduce high background staining in whole-mount ISH, particularly in pigmented tissues like tadpole tails? High background in whole-mount samples can be addressed through two key methods:
Q3: My ISH signal is weak or absent for a low-abundance target. What solutions can I implement? For low-abundance targets, consider these approaches:
Q4: What are the common causes of high background in chromogenic ISH (CISH) and how can I fix them? High background in CISH often stems from:
Table: Troubleshooting Common ISH Problems
| Problem | Possible Cause | Recommended Solution |
|---|---|---|
| Weak or No Signal | RNA degradation due to improper handling [14] | Fix tissue immediately after collection; use RNase-free techniques and reagents [14] |
| Under-digestion with protease [14] [6] | Optimize protease concentration and incubation time (e.g., perform a titration experiment for Proteinase K) [14] | |
| Low abundance of target mRNA [55] | Switch to a signal amplification method like RNAscope or smFISH [55] [10] | |
| High Background Staining | Inadequate stringency washes [14] [6] | Increase temperature and/or decrease salt concentration in post-hybridization washes [14] |
| Tissue over-digestion with protease [14] | Reduce protease concentration and/or incubation time [14] | |
| Tissue drying during protocol [14] [6] | Keep slides submerged or in a humidified chamber at all times [14] | |
| Poor Tissue Morphology | Over-digestion with protease [14] | Titrate protease to find a balance between signal penetration and morphology preservation [14] |
| Incomplete or improper fixation [6] | Ensure fixation is performed with fresh, appropriate fixative for the recommended duration [6] [19] | |
| No Signal with Positive Control | Inactive enzyme conjugate [6] | Test conjugate activity by mixing it with its substrate; a color change should occur within minutes [6] |
| Incorrect probe-conjugate pairing [6] | Verify that biotin-labeled probes are used with anti-biotin conjugate, and DIG-labeled probes with anti-DIG conjugate [6] |
The RNAscope assay is a novel ISH method that uses a patented double-"Z" probe design for signal amplification and background suppression, making it ideal for detecting lowly expressed genes [55] [19].
Workflow Overview
Materials and Reagents
Step-by-Step Methodology
Scoring Guidelines Score the staining by counting the number of dots per cell, as each dot represents an individual mRNA molecule [19].
Table: RNAscope Semi-Quantitative Scoring Guidelines [19]
| Score | Staining Criteria | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | No staining or <1 dot per 10 cells | Negative |
| 1 | 1-3 dots per cell | Very low expression |
| 2 | 4-9 dots per cell, very few clusters | Low to moderate expression |
| 3 | 10-15 dots per cell, <10% in clusters | Moderate to high expression |
| 4 | >15 dots per cell, >10% in clusters | Very high expression |
This protocol is optimized for samples prone to high background, such as the regenerating tails of Xenopus laevis tadpoles, and can be adapted for other pigmented or fragile whole-mount samples [54].
Workflow Overview
Materials and Reagents
Step-by-Step Methodology
Table: Essential Reagents for ISH in Challenging Samples
| Reagent | Function | Application Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Digoxigenin (DIG)-labeled RNA Probes | Hapten-labeled nucleic acid probe for high-sensitivity detection of target RNA [14]. | RNA probes 250-1500 bases long offer high sensitivity and specificity. The label is detected by an anti-DIG antibody conjugate [14]. |
| Proteinase K | Proteolytic enzyme that digests proteins, increasing tissue permeability for probe access [14] [54]. | Concentration and time must be optimized (e.g., 20 µg/mL for 10-20 min). Over-digestion ruins morphology; under-digestion reduces signal [14]. |
| Formamide | Denaturing agent used in hybridization buffers [14] [10]. | Lowers the melting temperature (Tm) of nucleic acids, allowing hybridization to be performed at lower, less damaging temperatures (e.g., 55-62°C) [14]. |
| Saline Sodium Citrate (SSC) | Buffer used in post-hybridization stringency washes [14] [6]. | Stringency is controlled by temperature and SSC concentration. Lower SSC (e.g., 0.1x) and higher temperature (e.g., 75°C) increase stringency, reducing background [14] [6]. |
| RNAscope ZZ-Probe Pairs | Patented pairs of oligonucleotide probes that bind adjacent to the target RNA and to pre-amplifiers [55] [19]. | Enables branched DNA (bDNA) signal amplification. Provides exceptional signal-to-noise ratio for low-abundance targets and does not require an RNase-free environment [55] [19]. |
| MEMPFA Fixative | A buffered paraformaldehyde fixative for whole-mount samples [54]. | Superior for preserving tissue architecture and RNA integrity in delicate embryonic tissues compared to standard formalin [54]. |
In situ hybridization (ISH) is a powerful technique for detecting specific nucleic acid sequences within cells and tissues, providing crucial spatial information about gene expression. However, the accuracy and reliability of ISH results depend heavily on the use of appropriate control probes. These controls are essential for verifying assay specificity, assessing RNA integrity, and confirming proper experimental technique. Within the context of preventing RNA degradation—a primary challenge in ISH research—control probes provide the necessary benchmarks to distinguish true biological signals from technical artifacts. By systematically implementing positive, negative, and housekeeping gene controls, researchers can ensure their findings genuinely reflect the in vivo state of gene expression rather than degradation products or non-specific binding.
For a definitive ISH experiment, you should run at least three control slides per sample: one for your target marker, one with a positive control probe, and one with a negative control probe [20]. The positive control verifies that the sample's RNA is of sufficient quality for detection, while the negative control confirms the absence of non-specific background staining [56] [20]. Only when the positive control shows adequate signal (e.g., a score of ≥2 for RNAscope) and the negative control shows minimal to no signal (e.g., a score of <1) can you confidently interpret your target RNA results [19] [20].
Positive control probes should be selected based on the expected expression level of your target gene [56]. For most tissues, probes targeting housekeeping genes are recommended. Common positive controls include [19] [20]:
These probes are species-specific, so ensure you select the correct one for your sample [20]. For multiplex assays, combination positive control probes (e.g., targeting POLR2A, PPIB, and UBC together) are available [20].
A widely used universal negative control probe targets the dapB gene from Bacillus subtilis, a soil bacterium not present in most samples, making it suitable for virtually all sample types [56] [19] [20]. Alternatively, probes from unrelated species (e.g., a zebrafish probe used on human tissue) can also serve as effective negative controls [56]. A properly functioning negative control should generate no staining or very low background (e.g., <1 dot per 10 cells) in well-prepared tissue [19].
A weak positive control signal typically indicates a problem with RNA integrity or sample pretreatment [19]. This could result from:
You should optimize pretreatment conditions (e.g., adjust proteinase K concentration and incubation time) and verify that tissue fixation followed recommended guidelines (e.g., 16–32 hours in fresh 10% NBF for FFPE samples) [19] [20] [46].
High background in the negative control suggests non-specific probe binding or inadequate washing stringency [22]. Common causes include:
To resolve this, increase the stringency of your washes (e.g., higher temperature, lower salt concentration), ensure proper blocking, and maintain adequate humidity throughout the hybridization steps [22] [19].
| Problem | Possible Causes | Solutions |
|---|---|---|
| Weak or No Positive Control Signal | RNA degradation due to delayed fixation or RNase contamination [14] [34]Insufficient permeabilization [14] [22]Over-fixation (>32 hours in formalin) [20] [46]Under-fixation (<16 hours) [20] | Optimize proteinase K concentration and time [14]Follow recommended fixation: 16–32 h in fresh 10% NBF [20]Use RNase-free reagents and conditions [14] [34] |
| High Background in Negative Control | Excessive probe concentration [22] [34]Insufficient post-hybridization washes [22]Incomplete blocking [22]Tissue drying during procedure [19] [20] | Perform stringency washes with higher temperature/lower SSC [22]Include blocking agents in hybridization buffer [22]Maintain humidified chamber; ensure hydrophobic barrier intact [19] [20] |
| Uneven Staining Across Tissue | Uneven probe application [22]Incomplete tissue coverage [22]Air bubbles under coverslip [22] | Apply probe evenly; use coverslips for uniform distribution [22]Seal humidified chamber properly to prevent evaporation [22] [20] |
| Non-Specific Signals | Off-target probe binding [22]Insufficient probe specificity verification | Confirm probe specificity with BLAST [34]Include RNase-treated control to verify RNA-dependent signal [22] [34] |
| Target Expression Level | Recommended Control | Copies/Cell | Application |
|---|---|---|---|
| Low | POLR2A | 5–15 | Best for validating detection of low-abundance targets [19] |
| Moderate | PPIB | 10–30 | Standard positive control for most tissues [19] [20] |
| High | UBC | >15 | Suitable for high-expression targets or system optimization [19] |
The RNAscope assay uses a semi-quantitative scoring system based on the number of dots per cell, where each dot represents a single mRNA molecule [20]. The table below outlines the standardized scoring criteria [19]:
| Score | Staining Pattern | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | No staining or <1 dot/10 cells | No specific expression detected |
| 1 | 1-3 dots/cell | Low-level expression |
| 2 | 4-9 dots/cell; very few dot clusters | Moderate expression |
| 3 | 10-15 dots/cell; <10% dots in clusters | High expression |
| 4 | >15 dots/cell; >10% dots in clusters | Very high expression |
For assay validation, successful positive control staining should generate a score of ≥2 for PPIB or ≥3 for UBC, while the negative control (dapB) should typically score <1 [19] [20].
Proper sample preparation is fundamental to preserving RNA integrity and obtaining reliable control probe results:
The following diagram illustrates the recommended workflow for implementing and qualifying control probes in your ISH experiments:
| Reagent Category | Specific Products | Function in Control Experiments |
|---|---|---|
| Control Probes | dapB Negative Control [56] [19], PPIB Positive Control [19] [20], POLR2A Positive Control [20], UBC Positive Control [19] | Verify assay specificity and sample RNA quality |
| Specialized Slides | SuperFrost Plus Slides [19] [20] | Prevent tissue detachment during high-temperature hybridization steps |
| Barrier Pens | ImmEdge Hydrophobic Barrier Pen [19] [20] | Maintain reagent containment and prevent tissue drying |
| Fixation Reagents | 10% Neutral Buffered Formalin (NBF) [20] [46], 4% Paraformaldehyde (PFA) [22] [34] | Preserve tissue morphology and RNA integrity |
| Permeabilization Agents | Proteinase K [14] [22], Triton X-100 [22] [46] | Enable probe access to target nucleic acids |
| Detection Systems | Anti-DIG-alkaline phosphatase [14] [34], Streptavidin-HRP [22] [34], RNAscope Detection Kits [19] [20] | Visualize hybridized probes |
The implementation of robust control probes is not merely an optional validation step but a fundamental requirement for rigorous ISH experimentation. Positive controls targeting appropriate housekeeping genes verify RNA integrity and assay performance, while negative controls like dapB confirm specificity and minimal background interference. By adhering to standardized scoring guidelines, following optimized sample preparation protocols, and systematically troubleshooting control results, researchers can confidently interpret their ISH data while effectively monitoring and preventing RNA degradation. This disciplined approach to control implementation ensures the generation of spatially accurate, reliable gene expression data that advances our understanding of biological systems and drug mechanisms.
Within the broader context of preventing RNA degradation during in situ hybridization (ISH) protocol research, validating RNA preservation is a critical first step. The use of positive control probes provides a direct and reliable method to gauge sample quality and integrity before proceeding with costly and time-consuming experiments targeting genes of interest. This guide details how to implement these controls effectively to troubleshoot and verify that RNA is adequately preserved for detection.
1. Why do I need a positive control probe to check RNA quality? The RNAscope assay uses universal conditions, but tissue RNA quality and fixation can vary significantly. A positive control probe confirms that your sample preparation, fixation, and pretreatment steps have successfully preserved the target RNA and that the assay was performed correctly. It distinguishes between a failed experiment and a true negative result for your target gene [57] [58].
2. How do I choose the right positive control probe? The key criterion is to match the expression level of your positive control probe to the expected expression level of your experimental target. Using a high-expression control for a low-expression target can lead to false negative results for your experimental probe [57].
3. What does a "good" result with a positive control probe look like? A good result shows strong, specific staining with the positive control probe and clean, no-staining background with the negative control probe (e.g., one targeting the bacterial DapB gene) [57] [58]. The specific pattern will be punctate dots, each representing a single RNA molecule.
4. My positive control signal is weak or absent. What does this mean? A weak or absent positive control signal typically indicates an issue with sample quality or the technical assay. The most common causes are RNA degradation due to improper tissue handling or fixation, or suboptimal pretreatment conditions (e.g., over- or under-digestion with protease) during the ISH protocol [57] [59].
5. What are the recommended housekeeping genes for positive controls? Commonly used and validated housekeeping genes for positive control probes include PPIB (Cyclophilin B), POLR2A (RNA polymerase II), and UBC (Ubiquitin C). Their recommended use depends on the expression level of your target RNA, as summarized in the table below [57] [60].
Table 1: Selecting the Appropriate Positive Control Probe
| Positive Control Probe | Expression Level (copies per cell) | Recommendations and Applications |
|---|---|---|
| POLR2A | Low (3-15) | A rigorous control for low-expression targets; suitable for proliferating tissues like tumors, retina, and lymphoid tissues. |
| PPIB | Medium (10-30) | The most flexible and commonly recommended control for most tissues. Provides a rigorous check for sample quality and technical performance. |
| UBC | Medium/High (>20) | For use with high-expression targets only. Not recommended for low-expression targets as it can lead to false negatives. |
A weak positive control signal points to problems with RNA integrity or the assay itself. The following workflow and table guide you through the logical steps to diagnose and resolve the issue.
Diagram 1: Troubleshooting a Weak Positive Control Signal
Table 2: Diagnosing and Solving Common RNA Quality Issues
| Problem Root Cause | Specific Checks & Experiments | Recommended Solutions & Best Practices |
|---|---|---|
| Poor RNA Integrity / Degradation | - Perform a complementary method (e.g., qRT-PCR) on extracted RNA to confirm the positive control gene is expressed [59].- Check RNA Integrity Number (RIN) with a BioAnalyzer; a low RIN indicates degradation [61].- Treat a sample with RNase A (50 µg/mL, 30-60 min at 37°C) before hybridization; signal should disappear, confirming it is RNA-derived [59]. | - Flash-freeze tissues immediately after collection in liquid nitrogen. Store at -80°C or in liquid nitrogen [61].- Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles of tissue or extracted RNA [61].- Use RNase-free techniques, gloves, and solutions throughout [14]. |
| Suboptimal Fixation | - Review fixation protocol. Inconsistent or prolonged fixation can mask RNA. | - Fix tissues promptly in 10% Neutral Buffered Formalin (NBF) for 24-48 hours [58].- Do not over-fix. |
| Inadequate Pretreatment | - Perform a pretreatment titration experiment. This is the most critical step for optimization [57] [14].- Test different protease digestion times (e.g., 10-20 minutes at 37°C) or concentrations [14]. | - Insufficient digestion reduces signal; over-digestion damages tissue morphology. Find the optimal balance for your tissue type [14] [58].- Follow manufacturer or published guidelines for specific tissue types (e.g., from the RNAscope reference guide) [58]. |
Table 3: Essential Research Reagents for RNA Quality Control
| Reagent / Material | Function & Role in Validation |
|---|---|
| Species-Specific Positive Control Probes (PPIB, POLR2A, UBC) | Hybridize to endogenous housekeeping RNAs to confirm the sample's RNA is preserved and accessible for detection [57] [60]. |
| Negative Control Probe (e.g., DapB) | Targets a bacterial gene not present in the sample. Confirms the absence of non-specific background staining, ensuring signal specificity [57] [58]. |
| RNase A | An enzyme that degrades RNA. Used in a control experiment to confirm that the observed FISH signal is from RNA and not non-specific background [59]. |
| Proteinase K | A protease used during pretreatment to digest proteins and permeabilize the tissue, allowing probe access to RNA. Its concentration and incubation time require optimization [14]. |
| RNAstable or RNAlater | Commercial solutions used to stabilize and protect RNA in fresh tissues at room temperature for transport or short-term storage before fixation or freezing. |
| Tri Reagent | A monophasic solution of phenol and guanidine thiocyanate used for the simultaneous isolation of RNA, DNA, and proteins from a sample. Allows for RNA integrity checking [61]. |
Q1: What is the primary function of a negative control probe in an ISH experiment? The negative control probe verifies the specificity of your ISH assay by detecting non-specific background staining. It is designed to not hybridize to any endogenous sequences in your sample. A successful assay shows minimal to no signal with the negative control, confirming that the staining observed with your target probe is specific hybridization and not background artifact [57].
Q2: Which negative control probe is recommended for RNAscope assays? For RNAscope assays, the universal negative control probe targets the bacterial dapB gene (from Bacillus subtilis) [19] [57] [62]. Since this bacterial gene is absent in human and other mammalian tissues, any signal from the dapB probe indicates non-specific background or suboptimal assay conditions. The expected result is a score of less than 1 (no staining or less than 1 dot per 10 cells) [19] [12].
Q3: What should I do if my negative control shows high background staining? Background in the negative control (e.g., dapB) indicates issues with assay conditions. Key troubleshooting steps include:
Q4: Are there alternatives to the standard dapB negative control probe? Yes, alternatives can be used, though dapB is the standard. Other options include:
Q5: How are negative controls used in quantitative analysis? In assays like RNAscope, staining is evaluated using a semi-quantitative scoring system based on the number of dots per cell. The table below outlines the standard scoring criteria. For a valid assay, the negative control (dapB) should typically score <1, indicating no significant background [19] [12].
Table 1: RNAscope Scoring Guidelines for Interpreting Results
| Score | Criteria | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | No staining or <1 dot/10 cells | Negative |
| 1 | 1-3 dots/cell | Very low/weak expression |
| 2 | 4-9 dots/cell; very few dot clusters | Low to moderate expression |
| 3 | 10-15 dots/cell; <10% dots in clusters | Moderate to high expression |
| 4 | >15 dots/cell; >10% dots in clusters | Very high expression |
Potential Causes and Solutions:
Cause: Over-digestion with Protease
Cause: Slides Dried Out During Assay
Cause: Incomplete Washes or Old Reagents
Potential Causes and Solutions:
Cause: RNA Degradation
Cause: Under-fixation or Over-fixation
Cause: Suboptimal Pretreatment
The following workflow diagram illustrates the recommended steps for qualifying your samples and assays using positive and negative control probes.
Diagram 1: Control Probe Validation Workflow
Detailed Methodology for Control Validation:
Sample Preparation:
Running Control Probes:
Interpretation and Qualification:
Table 2: Essential Materials for RNAscope ISH with Controls
| Item | Function/Importance | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|
| Superfrost Plus Slides | Optimal section adhesion during stringent assay steps | Required; other slides may cause tissue detachment [19] [12]. |
| ImmEdge Hydrophobic Barrier Pen | Creates a barrier to prevent reagent evaporation and tissue drying | Vector Laboratories Cat. No. 310018; specified as the only pen that works reliably [19] [12]. |
| Positive Control Probes (PPIB, POLR2A, UBC) | Verify sample RNA integrity and assay technique | Choose based on target expression: PPIB/POLR2A for low-copy targets, UBC for high-copy targets [57]. |
| Negative Control Probe (dapB) | Distinguish specific signal from non-specific background | Universal bacterial gene control for assessing assay background [57] [62]. |
| HybEZ Oven | Maintains optimum humidity and temperature during hybridization | Required for RNAscope manual assays to prevent drying and ensure consistent results [19] [12]. |
| Fresh 10% NBF | Preserves tissue morphology and RNA integrity | Fix tissues for 16-32 hours at room temperature for optimal results [11] [12]. |
| Protease | Permeabilizes tissue to allow probe access | Concentration and time must be optimized for each tissue type to avoid over- or under-digestion [14] [19]. |
Q1: What are the primary sources of RNA degradation in ISH experiments, and how can I prevent them?
RNA degradation primarily originates from ribonuclease (RNase) contamination, which is ubiquitous on skin, glassware, and laboratory surfaces. Additionally, improper tissue fixation and storage can lead to RNA degradation over time [14].
Prevention Strategies:
Q2: Why is my negative control (dapB) showing high background signal?
A high signal in your negative control (e.g., bacterial dapB) indicates non-specific binding or high background, often due to [12] [19]:
Solution: Ensure you follow the recommended protease titration and incubation times. Always keep slides hydrated and use a hydrophobic barrier pen to prevent drying [14] [19].
Q3: My positive control (PPIB) signal is weak or absent. What went wrong?
A weak or absent positive control signal suggests poor RNA preservation, insufficient permeabilization, or inefficient probe hybridization [12] [19].
Troubleshooting Steps:
Table 1: Troubleshooting Common RNA Degradation and Signal Issues
| Problem | Potential Causes | Recommended Solutions |
|---|---|---|
| High Background (Negative Control) | Sample drying out; Insufficient protease digestion; Over-fixed tissue [14] [12]. | Keep slides hydrated; Optimize protease concentration and time; Extend retrieval times for over-fixed tissue [14] [19]. |
| Weak or No Signal (Positive Control) | RNA degradation; Under-fixed tissue; Insufficient permeabilization [46] [19]. | Check RNA quality with control probes; Ensure fixation in 10% NBF for 16-32 hours; Optimize antigen retrieval and protease steps [12] [46]. |
| Poor Detection Efficiency in MERFISH | Probe hybridization issues; Signal bleaching; Non-specific readout probe binding [40]. | Optimize encoding probe design and hybridization buffer; Use fresh imaging buffers; Pre-screen readout probes for sample-specific background [40]. |
| Loss of Signal in Sequential Rounds (MERFISH/seqFISH) | Sample degradation over multiple rounds; Photobleaching; Reagent instability [40]. | Use protective imaging buffers to enhance fluorophore longevity; Check reagent stability and prepare fresh for long experiments [40]. |
Proper sample preparation is the most critical step in preventing RNA degradation and ensuring reliable ISH results [46].
Key Steps:
Recent optimizations for MERFISH can be applied to enhance performance and combat signal loss [40].
Table 2: Essential Reagents for Preventing RNA Degradation in ISH
| Reagent/Material | Function | Key Considerations |
|---|---|---|
| Neutral Buffered Formalin (NBF) | Tissue fixative that preserves structure and immobilizes RNA. | Must be fresh; Fixation time of 16-32 hours is optimal; Avoid over- or under-fixation [46] [19]. |
| Proteinase K | Protease for tissue permeabilization, enabling probe access. | Requires titration for each tissue type and fixation condition to balance signal and morphology [14] [12]. |
| RNAscope Control Probes (PPIB, dapB) | Assess sample RNA quality and assay performance. | PPIB (low-copy) score should be ≥2; dapB should show minimal background (<1) [12] [19]. |
| HybEZ Hybridization System | Maintains optimum humidity and temperature during ISH. | Prevents sample drying, a major cause of high background staining [12] [19]. |
| Formamide | Chemical denaturant in hybridization buffers. | Lower concentrations can increase signal brightness; optimal concentration should be determined empirically [14] [40]. |
| bDNA Amplifiers | Signal amplification for methods like MERFISH. | Increases signal brightness without increasing spot size or variation, improving detection efficiency for low-abundance RNAs [64]. |
The following diagram illustrates the critical decision points and procedures for safeguarding RNA integrity from sample collection to detection.
This diagram compares the core mechanisms of three key signal amplification methods used in advanced ISH techniques to combat limited signal, which is crucial when targeting degraded or low-abundance RNA.
This technical support center provides targeted troubleshooting guides and FAQs to help researchers overcome the critical challenge of RNA degradation during in situ hybridization (ISH) protocols. The content is specifically framed within the context of a broader thesis on maintaining RNA integrity, leveraging recent advances in platforms and probes to enhance resistance to degradation.
Q1: What are the most critical steps to prevent RNA degradation during sample preparation? Proper sample fixation is the most critical factor. Tissues should be transferred into ice-cold RNase-free PBS within 30 minutes of collection and immediately fixed or frozen [34]. For FFPE samples, fixation in fresh 10% Neutral Buffered Formalin (NBF) for 16–32 hours at room temperature is recommended [50] [19]. Avoid fixation at 4°C or for durations outside this window, as under-fixation leads to protease over-digestion and RNA loss, while over-fixation reduces probe accessibility [50]. All buffers and water must be RNase-free, prepared with DEPC-treated water, and RNase inhibitors should be added to all solutions to maintain an RNase-free environment [14] [34].
Q2: How do novel probe design strategies enhance resistance to degradation? Modern probe systems utilize several advanced strategies. RNAscope employs double-Z probe design where two independent probe pairs must bind adjacent to each other for signal amplification, dramatically increasing specificity and protecting against non-specific binding and degradation [19]. For sensitive detection, RNA probes should be 250–1,500 bases long, with approximately 800 bases exhibiting optimal sensitivity and specificity [14]. Single-molecule FISH (smFISH) uses multiple short, singly-labeled oligonucleotide probes (20-mer) that collectively span the target transcript, providing redundancy and enabling precise quantification even if some probes are degraded [10].
Q3: What are the recommended storage conditions to preserve RNA integrity in samples? For short-term storage, freeze samples at -20°C. For long-term storage: cryosections at -80°C, or paraffin sections in 100% ethanol at -20°C [34]. ACDBio specifically recommends storing older slides in 100% ethanol at -20°C or in a plastic box covered in saran wrap at -20°C or -80°C, which preserves slides for several years [14]. Never store slides dry at room temperature, as this dramatically accelerates RNA degradation [14].
Q4: How does the RNAscope platform specifically address RNA degradation challenges? The RNAscope technology represents a major advance with its signal amplification and background suppression technology that does not require an RNase-free environment once samples are properly fixed [19]. The platform uses a novel multiplex probe design that provides superior sensitivity and specificity in FFPE tissues compared to traditional ISH technologies [65]. Its proprietary probe design allows visualization of RNA expression with unambiguous signal, making it particularly resistant to degradation challenges that plague conventional ISH methods [65].
Table 1: Common RNA Degradation Problems and Solutions
| Problem | Possible Causes | Recommended Solutions |
|---|---|---|
| Low or no signal | RNA degradation due to delayed fixation [6] [50] | Fix tissues immediately after collection (within 30 minutes) in fresh 10% NBF [50] [34] |
| Improper storage conditions [14] [66] | Store samples at -80°C or in 100% ethanol at -20°C; avoid dry storage at room temperature [14] [34] | |
| Over-fixed tissue causing poor probe accessibility [50] | Limit fixation to 16-32 hours; optimize protease digestion time for over-fixed samples [50] [19] | |
| High background staining | Incomplete stringent washes [6] | Use SSC buffer at 75-80°C for stringent washes; increase temperature by 1°C per slide for multiple slides (max 80°C) [6] |
| Tissue drying during processing [6] | Ensure slides never dry out at any point during the procedure; use hydrophobic barrier pens [6] [19] | |
| Probe binding to repetitive sequences [6] | Add COT-1 DNA during hybridization to block repetitive sequences [6] | |
| Poor tissue morphology | Proteinase K over-digestion [14] [50] | Optimize proteinase K concentration (1-20 µg/mL) and incubation time; titrate for specific tissue types [14] [34] |
| Under-fixation of tissue specimens [50] | Ensure adequate fixation time (16-32 hours for FFPE) and proper fixative volume [50] |
Principle: This protocol utilizes the RNAscope platform's proprietary probe technology that provides exceptional resistance to RNA degradation through its unique signal amplification system [19].
Materials:
Methodology:
Validation: Use RNAscope scoring guidelines: Score 0 (no staining) to 4 (>15 dots/cell with >10% clusters) [19].
Principle: This protocol from RIDR methodology enables precise RNA visualization alongside protein markers, particularly useful for studying RNA decay dynamics [67].
Materials:
Methodology:
Table 2: Essential Research Reagent Solutions for RNA Degradation Prevention
| Reagent/Category | Function in Preventing RNA Degradation | Specific Examples & Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Fixatives | Preserves tissue architecture and RNA integrity by cross-linking | Fresh 10% NBF (16-32 hrs) [50]; 4% PFA for cryosections (15-30 min) [34] |
| RNase Inhibitors | Protects RNA from enzymatic degradation during processing | RNasin (add to solutions); Superase.In (in permeabilization buffers) [67] [34] |
| Proteases | Controlled permeabilization for probe access without RNA loss | Proteinase K (1-20 µg/mL), titrate for tissue type [14] [34] |
| Specialized Probes | Enhanced binding specificity and signal amplification | RNAscope double-Z probes [19]; smFISH oligonucleotide sets (48 probes/target) [67] |
| Storage Solutions | Long-term preservation of RNA integrity | 100% ethanol at -20°C [14]; DNA/RNA Protection Reagent for frozen samples [66] |
| Barrier Pens | Prevents tissue drying and subsequent RNA degradation | ImmEdge Hydrophobic Barrier Pen (maintains barrier throughout procedure) [19] |
| Mounting Media | Preserves signal with anti-fade properties | EcoMount or PERTEX for fluorescent detection [19]; ProLong Diamond for smFISH-IF [67] |
Diagram 1: Comprehensive Workflow for RNA Degradation Prevention in ISH. This workflow integrates sample preparation best practices with novel probe technologies to enhance RNA stability throughout the ISH procedure.
Diagram 2: RNA Degradation Troubleshooting Logic Flow. This diagnostic flowchart helps researchers systematically identify and address the root causes of RNA degradation in their ISH experiments.
Preventing RNA degradation is not a single step but a holistic practice that permeates every stage of the ISH protocol, from initial sample collection to final imaging. A firm grasp of foundational threats, combined with a rigorously applied methodological workflow, forms the first line of defense. When challenges arise, a systematic troubleshooting approach, rooted in a clear understanding of the underlying principles, is key to diagnosis and resolution. Ultimately, the validity of any ISH experiment is cemented by robust validation using appropriate controls, which confirm that the observed signal is a true reflection of intact, localized RNA. As spatial transcriptomics continues to revolutionize biomedical research, the principles of RNA preservation will remain the bedrock upon which high-quality, reproducible, and impactful scientific discoveries are built. Future directions will likely see the development of even more resilient probe chemistries and stabilization reagents, further empowering researchers in drug development and clinical diagnostics.